Figure 1. The relative velocity of the binary stars' components as a function of
their mean separation. The observed velocities are consistent with
orbital motion since they (1) decrease with separation and (2) are
generally greater for systems with higher mass primary stars
(M1 > 1 M and
M1 < 1 M
are
plotted as squares and circles respectively). The measurements are
compared to that expected from a set of randomly oriented binary stars
with total masses of 0.2, 1, 3, and 7 M
. Although any individual total mass
estimate is unreliable due to projection effects, the sample has an
average total dynamical mass of ~ 1.7 M
. (Taken from Ghez et al. 1995.)
Figure 2. Location of TY CrA primary and secondary stars in the theoretical H-R diagram. The hatched regions designate high-confidence domains for the primary and secondary based on light-curve analyses. Dotted lines are drawn at constant radii. Solid and dashed lines correspond to pre-main-sequence tracks of Swenson et al. (1994), calculated for the masses of the TY CrA components at solar (solid curve) and Hyades (dashed curve) compositions. Open boxes and triangles mark isochrone points at ages of 3 x 106 yr and 10 x 107 yr, respectively. (Taken from Casey et al. 1998.)
Figure 3. The stars of the GG Tau quadruple system compared with the theoretical
evolutionary tracks of Baraffe et al. (1998; =1.9).
The range of plausible temperatures
for each component are determined using a dwarf temperature scale
(solid squares; Leggett et al. 1996) and a giant temperature scale
(open diamonds; Perrin et al. 1998). Since the dwarf and giant
temperature scales are nearly identical for the two hottest components,
these two stars define an isochrone (dashed line) that can be used
to test evolutionary models and the T Tauri temperature scale
at lower masses. Of the models tested, the Baraffe et al.
models yield the most consistent ages using a temperature scale
intermediate between that of dwarfs and giants. These tracks and the
implied coeval temperature scale (asterisks) yield a substellar mass of
0.044
0.04 M
for the lowest mass component of GG Tau.
(Taken from White et al. 1999)
Figure 4. Owens Valley Radio Observatory = 1.3 mm continuum map (top) of
UZ Tau, a young quadruple system, along with a schematic model for the
system (bottom). UZ Tau W is a 50 AU binary,
separated by 500 AU from the sub-AU binary UZ Tau E\null.
UZ Tau E has a massive circumbinary disk, seemingly undisturbed by either
the central close binary or by UZ Tau W located several disk
radii away in projection. In contrast UZ Tau W, a binary with a
separation similar to typical disk radii, shows substantially less disk
emission, though it retains some mass in one or two unresolved
circumstellar disks. (Adapted from Jensen et al. 1996b.)
Figure 5. Left---The stellar components of the GG Tau binary are shown as stars.
The circumbinary ring is evident in the light shaded region,
displaying 1.3 mm continuum emission.
The contours display three velocity channels of
13CO 2-1 emission: 5.55 km/sec, 6.30 km/sec and 7.05 km/sec, increasing
from left to right in the figure. The spatial gradient in the line emission
is consistent with Keplerian motion about a binary of 1.3 (D/140 pc) M. The
synthesized beam is 0.88'' x 0.56''. Right---The J-band adaptive optics
image. The white ellipse is the same in both figures and represents the ring
average radius. Evidently the light in the near infrared coincides
with the circumbinary ring seen in millimeter light, and is interpreted as
scattered light off the inner edge of the ring. (Taken from Guilloteau
et al. 1999; the J-band image is from Roddier et al. 1996.)
Figure 6. VLA image of the L1551 IRS5 region at 7 mm. The two compact sources
are interpreted as protoplanetary disks in a gravitationally bound
protobinary system. The masses of the individual disks are of order
0.05 M, adequate to form
planetary systems like our own. However the spatially resolved
projected semimajor axes are only 10 AU, perhaps due to dynamical
truncation by the stars. The half-power contour of the VLA beam was
0.05", opening a new forefront in
high-resolution observations of young binary systems. (Taken from
Rodriguez et al. 1998.)
Eric Jensen <ejensen1@swarthmore.edu> Last modified: Fri Sep 24 15:40:04 1999